cumaeansibyl:

fandomsandfeminism:

Fun fact: anytime you hear a story that boils down to “and then some ABSOLUTE FOOL sued this totally innocent megacorporation for assloads of money AND WON! Can you believe it? Ridiculous. Some people, right?” 99 times out of 100, the corporation super fucked up, the plaintiff 100% deserved that money,.and you’ve just been fed corporate propaganda.

And about 75 times out of 100 the awards get reduced on appeal. but the propagandists still tell you “oh my god this idiot won $20 million” when after everything shook out they walked away with enough to cover their costs and not much more

(by the way, in the American legal system it’s rare for the winning party to be awarded court costs, so you will have to pay your lawyer if you win)

mothdogs:

God remember when u were 12 and you would just Make Art on like spare copy paper with crayola markers and an old pencil and even though you didn’t know anything about anatomy or perspective or anything you were jus happy to b Making Art and u didn’t constantly belittle your own efforts or feel like ur drawings weren’t good enough

wodneswynn:

elodieunderglass:

draws-memes:

elodieunderglass:

madgastronomer:

bilt2tumble:

sirfrogsworth:

I’m not sure where I fall on the “swans are evil” debate, but I kinda like this one. 

This one is PARTICULARLY concerning because there is a distinct possibility that it KNOWS what the sign says and is trying to remove it in order to attract more victims.

@elodieunderglass

resist the labels that do not apply to you

@sirfrogsworth @elodieunderglass

image

I still really like this, @draws-memes … it seems to have some kind of weird totemic significance.

This is really cool and all but like the label definitely does apply to them